A method for confirming what you publish, not a promise to publish faster.
Aurentix works with reporters and small newsrooms across Kenya on the practical, lawful steps that stand behind a piece before it goes out: tracing claims to their origin, weighing sources, and recording how each fact was checked.
Why this exists
Investigative work is judged, in the end, by whether it holds up. Aurentix does not chase headlines; it builds the habit of checking — tracing a claim back to where it started, deciding how many sources a statement needs, and being honest about what remains unconfirmed.
- Method built for lawful, open-source verification
- Written logs you keep and reuse
- Independent editorial review before publication
Verification Method Session
A repeatable method for confirming material before publication.
LEARN MORE →Image and Video Confirmation
Practical work confirming visual material with open sources.
LEARN MORE →Editorial Verification Review
An independent review of a completed piece before it runs.
LEARN MORE →Tracing a Claim to Its First Source
Why the second-hand report is rarely enough on its own.
Reading a Photograph Before You Trust It
Matching visible detail against open, dated reference material.
What an Editorial Review Actually Checks
Turning a finished draft into a list of assertions and evidence.
How we approach the work
- Method applied to your own material, not a template
- Open, lawful sourcing only — no covert methods
- Every finding recorded in a log you keep
If you'd like to talk through where your current process could be tightened, we're glad to hear from you.
START A CONVERSATION"The verification log alone changed how our newsroom handles disputed claims."
"Practical, unhurried, and specific to the piece we brought in."
"They were honest about what couldn't be confirmed, which mattered more than a fast answer."